I think there's a certain lyricism in the telling of a scientific story.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Strictly speaking, the idea of a scientific poem is probably as nonsensical as that of a poetic science.
Most songwriters who have been lucky enough to have their song on the radio or be heard widely don't know anything about science. The best songs have a strong dose of metaphor. Most songs about science don't have that. Like 'She Blinded Me With Science.' It's a stupid song, no offense to Thomas Dolby.
Being used to scientific terminology and theory it was always natural for me to push this stuff into songs.
In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's the exact opposite.
I am only conscious of any satisfaction in Scientific Reading or thinking when it rounds off into a poetical generality and vagueness.
Scientific understanding is often beautiful, a profoundly aesthetic experience which gives pleasure not unlike the reading of a great poem.
When I look at the arc of my career, my focus is on lyricism, right? I own that.
In those days, it didn't take much imagination to come up with something that required great lyric development skills. You just thought of an experience that you might have gone through, and write it down.
An enormous amount of scientific language is metaphorical. We talk about a genetic code, where code originally meant a cipher; we talk about the solar system model of the atom as though the atom were like a sun and moon and planets.
The lyrics are constructed as empirically as the music. I don't set out to say anything very important.
No opposing quotes found.