I believe the main solution is to gain the trust of Europe and America and to remove their concerns over the peaceful nature of our nuclear industry and to assure them that there will never be a diversion to military use.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We must take steps to prevent further nuclear weapons development or modernization.
We must eliminate all nuclear weapons in order to eliminate the grave risk they pose to our world. This will require persistent efforts by all countries and peoples. A nuclear war would affect everyone, and all have a stake in preventing this nightmare.
The message from national security experts and citizens around the world is clear: The only way to eliminate the global nuclear danger is to eliminate all nuclear weapons.
I believe that nuclear needs to be a part of the solution if the U.S. really wants to be aggressive about reducing carbon.
It would be our policy to use nuclear weapons wherever we felt it necessary to protect our forces and achieve our objectives.
The international community must do a better job of controlling the risks of nuclear proliferation. Sensitive parts of the nuclear fuel cycle - the production of new fuel, the processing of weapon-usable material, the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste - would be less vulnerable to proliferation if brought under multinational control.
I think we ultimately ought to look to put all uranium enrichment and fuel reprocessing, if any is done, under multinational control. Those are the two technologies by which nuclear energy can be translated into nuclear weapons programmes.
I am certain that we need a solution completely separate from military intervention.
We have to get rid of those nuclear weapons.
Our goal is simple: to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.