Verse, singing, and speech have a common origin.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Poetry carries its history within it, and it is oral in origin. Its transmission was oral.
While I've had a great distaste for what's usually called song in modern poetry or for what's usually called music, I really don't think of speech as so far from song.
Singing connected with movements and action is a much more ancient, and, at the same time, more complex phenomenon than is a simple song.
Poetry carries its history within it, and it is oral in origin. Its transmission was oral. Its transmission today is still in part oral, because we become acquainted with poetry through nursery rhymes, which we hear before we can read.
Lately I've been believing that music predates speech.
There are still many tribal cultures where poetry and song, there is just one word for them. There are other cultures with literacy where poetry and song are distinguished. But poetry always remembers that it has its origins in music.
When poetry separates from song, then the words have to carry all the rhythm themselves; they have to do all the work. They can't rely on the singing voice.
For my part, if I consider poetry as an object, I maintain that it is born of the necessity of adding a vocal sound (speech) to the hammering of the first tribal music.
It should here be added that poetry habitually takes the form of verse.
We all know what it means to be sung to. And poetry is very close to that.