How many of you have broken no laws this month? That's the kind of society I want to build. I want a guarantee - with physics and mathematics, not with laws - that we can give ourselves real privacy of personal communications.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The arc of technology is in the direction of unbreakable encryption, and no laws are going to get in the way of that reality.
I can't afford security. I can't afford a gated house. So, I feel a little vulnerable. I wish some laws would come into play.
The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry. But we live in a complex world where you're going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.
I want my government to do something about my privacy - I don't want to just do it on my own.
How to strike the right balance between our privacy and our expectation that the state will protect us and facilitate our freedom is one of the most difficult challenges facing us all.
You can't build a society without law.
People have a right to privacy, but they also have a right to live. Fundamentally, we need cybersecurity and need to secure communications as well.
I really think we need to see how we can expand our privacy laws.
I just want everybody to follow the law.
The last refuge of privacy cannot be placed solely in law or technology. It must repose in both, and a thoughtful combination of the two can help us thread a path between having all our secrets trivially discoverable and preserving nothing for our later selves for fear of that discovery.