The irrepressible conflict propounded by abolitionism has produced now its legitimate fruits - disunion.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think subsuming political and economic conflicts into some grand 'clash of civilisations' theory or 'the West versus the rest' binary is a particularly insidious form of ideological deception.
History is replete with ideologies of freedom, justice, liberation of the downtrodden and the exploited, that have been turned against the very people they had mobilised, or that have reproduced the same logic of exclusion and terror toward those whom they claimed to set free.
Experience has shown how deeply the seeds of war are planted by economic rivalry and social injustice.
Manufacturing and commercial monopolies owe their origin not to a tendency imminent in a capitalist economy but to governmental interventionist policy directed against free trade and laissez faire.
While we see the course of the final abolition of human slavery is onward, & we give it the aid of our prayers & all justifiable means in our power, we must leave the progress as well as the result in his hands who sees the end; who chooses to work by slow influences; & with whom two thousand years are but as a single day.
The liquidation of colonialism is a trend of the times which no force can hold back.
This and many others only confirmed me in the opinion, planted when I saw the sale of Martha Ann, and growing steadily thereafter, that slavery was an accursed business, and that the sooner my people were relieved of it, the better.
History shows that, more often than not, loss of sovereignty leads to liberalisation imposed in the interests of the powerful.
The seed of revolution is repression.
Originality is independence, not rebellion; it is sincerity, not antagonism.