In principle, every social situation involves strategic interaction among the participants.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
One might argue that proper understanding of any social situation would require game-theoretic analysis.
Strategy requires thought, tactics require observation.
Pretty much, you point to a problem and good reasoning about why people are doing what they are doing and what constraints they face in terms of how others will behave, and you're looking at a problem that could be improved upon by game-theoretic reasoning.
We must know our own roles. We should also know the roles that others play, and the rules such roles follow. In this manner, social harmony is maintained. It is when we overstep our roles, or act without knowing them, that social anarchy ensues.
Everyone designs who devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones.
I believe in collaboration and cooperation.
The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do.
My view is that, as management, the focus has to be on having a strategy and executing it. As you do the strategy and execution, it is important to communicate it consistently.
There is no fundamental social change by being simply of individual and interpersonal actions. You have to have organizations and institutions that make a fundamental difference.
I believe you learn social skills by mixing with people.
No opposing quotes found.