I would say readers can trust my work more than anyone else's.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
There's a unique bond of trust between readers and authors that I don't believe exists in any other art form; as a reader, I trust a novelist to give me his or her best effort, however flawed.
I don't trust anybody that doesn't do good work. I don't give them any credibility. If they can't write, why should I believe anything they have to say?
That is the thing about being a writer; your subject matter may not stay your subject matter if you break their trust by revealing personal and editorialized information about them.
I'm the kind of writer that people think other people are reading.
I am the kind of writer that people think other people are reading.
I suppose people might consider me a 'loose' reader, as I seem willing to read anything of quality thinking and prose.
Five people read my work before its ready for publication, and I solicit opinions from all of them: my wife, my agent, my editor, and my parents.
People who've read my reviews know my tastes, know how I approach a book, know my background. I can write with believable authority. It doesn't mean I'm always right.
I have to be careful. My readers are very detail-oriented, and if I make a mistake they'll call me on it.
It is unsafe to take your reader for more of a fool than he is.