I'm reluctantly interested in love and helplessly interested in logic and yet they're so conflicting. And they're both necessary for a happy balance, a happy existence... I think.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I'm not religious, I'm not romantic and I live purely by logic. I make every decision by logic and sometimes that leads me to the right and sometimes to the wrong decision.
Which is, I'm an optimist that two people can be together to work out their conflicts. And that commitment, I think, might be what love is, because they both grow from their relationship.
I like conflict - someone who challenges me, someone who I can look up to, someone who can keep me in check. Love has to be extraordinary; otherwise, there's no point in it. I just haven't met anyone who's made me feel that way.
Why would you want someone who is conflicted and doesn't know if they love you or not?
I always make a decision, even if it's the wrong one. I hate being confused.
Both should share the same concept of what a relationship means and the same energy to believe in a monogamous relationship.
I believe that two people are connected at the heart, and it doesn't matter what you do, or who you are or where you live; there are no boundaries or barriers if two people are destined to be together.
When dealing with people, remember you are not dealing with creatures of logic, but creatures of emotion.
To a person in love, the value of the individual is intuitively known. Love needs no logic for its mission.
The lover knows much more about absolute good and universal beauty than any logician or theologian, unless the latter, too, be lovers in disguise.