There are servers, and there are people that are served. There's something contradictory about that in a democracy, certainly.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The critical question is: How do we ensure that the Internet develops in a way that is compatible with democracy?
Democracy is a process.
Democracy is a good client.
Once you understand that everybody's going to get connected, a lot of things follow from that. If everybody gets the Internet, they end up with a browser, so they look at web pages - but they can also leave comments, create web pages. They can even host their own server! So not only is everybody consuming, they can also produce.
Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates.
It is not inevitable that the Internet will evolve in a manner compatible with democracy.
In a democracy there is a centralization of governmental power in a simple majority.
In a democracy everybody has a right to be represented, including the jerks.
Democracy is interactive... It's a constant job of information, education, explanation, listening, and interactive communication.
In democracy everyone has the right to be represented, even the jerks.
No opposing quotes found.