Whatever the scenario, the dynamism of developing nations, their demographics and competitive power are great sources for superiority.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I want the voice of developing countries to be stronger.
When civilizations collide, it usually isn't the more primitive one that prevails.
You are a large country, you have many resources, and you have people who are highly capable.
It is not an accident that developing countries - virtually the whole of East Asia, for example - view the role of the state in a far more interventionist way than does the Anglo-Saxon world. Laissez-faire and free markets are the favoured means of the powerful and privileged.
The strength and power of a country depends absolutely on the quantity of good men and women in it.
We may consider each generation as a distinct nation, with a right, by the will of its majority, to bind themselves, but none to bind the succeeding generation, more than the inhabitants of another country.
Based on all criteria - military power, economic influence, cultural dominance - America remains number one, even though other, new players are increasingly challenging it in that role.
The love of domination and an uncontrolled lust of arbitrary power have prevailed among all nations and perhaps in proportion to the degrees of civilization.
Wars of aggression are popular nowadays with those nations convinced that only victory and conquest could improve their material well-being.
If the nation is not capable of preserving itself and reproducing, if it loses it vital bearings and ideals, then it doesn't need foreign enemies - it will fall apart on its own.