It doesn't make sense to argue about how much global warming is caused by man - whether it's 5 percent or 50 percent.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Faced with the evidence, many deniers have started to admit that global warming is real, but argue that humans have little or nothing to do with it.
When we think about global warming at all, the arguments tend to be ideological, theological and economic.
My first inclination is to be a bit skeptical about the claims that human-produced carbon dioxide is the direct contributor to global warming.
When you analyze all the data, there is a warming trend according to science. But the jury is out on the degree of how much is manmade.
The truth is, as most of us know, that global warming is real and humans are major contributors, mainly because we wastefully burn fossil fuels.
The first thing that is not obvious to people is global warming is a less-than-1% effect. It's like being shortchanged at the bank by a penny every dollar. Over a long period of time with lots of transactions, that piles up.
Global warming is controversial, of course, but the controversy is mainly over whether human activity is driving it.
The question of whether or to what extent human activities are causing global warming is not a matter of ideology, let alone of belief. The issue is simply one of risk management.
It's absolutely not acceptable for people to argue that, if we are going to do anything about climate change at all, well, the responsibility lies solely with the individual.
It should simply be an empirical matter whether the climate is changing or not and whether we're responsible. But the various sides of the debate have now become so tribal that it's no longer a matter of changing our views as more information comes in.
No opposing quotes found.