I don't think we have reached a point where art really translates into science. Perhaps for some people, having good visuals can help translate into science.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
For some years, I've been very interested in the relationship between science and art.
The commonality between science and art is in trying to see profoundly - to develop strategies of seeing and showing.
Art and science have so much in common - the process of trial and error, finding something new and innovative, and to experiment and succeed in a breakthrough.
Art is science made clear.
Art and science are intrinsically the same except for one thing. The universe is in control of your science, whether it's right or wrong, and the public are in control of your art - if they're going to buy it, if you're going to make a living that way.
I would say the connection between art and science is very tenuous for me. It's just that I'm interested in both. I don't think that my interest in art affects the kind of science that I do.
Art is elemental. Reason alone as it's expressed in the sciences can't be man's complete answer to reality, and it can't express everything that man can, wants to, and has to express. I think God built this into man. Art along with science is the highest gift God has given him.
Art has a double face, of expression and illusion, just like science has a double face: the reality of error and the phantom of truth.
Art is essentially communication. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. That's why people make art, so other people can relate to it.
We will always have more to discover, more to invent, more to understand and that's much closer to art and literature than any science.
No opposing quotes found.