The right of absolute and irresponsible dominion is the right of property, and the right of property is the right of absolute, irresponsible dominion. The two are identical; the one necessarily implying the other.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Ultimately property rights and personal rights are the same thing.
Absolute liberty is absence of restraint; responsibility is restraint; therefore, the ideally free individual is responsible to himself.
The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.
As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.
The right to choose to live or to die is the most fundamental right there is; conversely, the duty to give others that opportunity to the best of our ability is the most fundamental duty there is.
In fact, a fundamental interdependence exists between the personal right to liberty and the personal right to property.
Those who believe that they are exclusively in the right are generally those who achieve something.
What is right and what is practicable are two different things.
I believe that every right implies a responsibility; every opportunity, an obligation; every possession, a duty.
Every right implies a responsibility; Every opportunity, an obligation, Every possession, a duty.