One of the most misleading representational techniques in our language is the use of the word 'I.'
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
In many people it is already an impertinence to say 'I'.
I never use the word 'I' when I interview someone. I think it's irrelevant.
To a physicist, we have the 'I' word, the I-word is 'impossible.' That's dangerous.
I was trained as journalist never to use the word 'I,' never to put my own opinion there. In fact, if you had a dollar or a euro for every time I use the word 'I,' you would be a poor person. But this is not true in general. I like the idea of being able to stand away and make a judgement.
French and German illustrate the misleading character of apparent grammatical simplicity just as well.
There is no 'I.' That's an illusion we've got to get beyond.
I still put punctuation in my texts. If it's an 'I', I make sure it's a capital.
The surest method of being incomprehensible or, moreover, to be misunderstood is to use words in their original sense; especially words from the ancient languages.
How often misused words generate misleading thoughts.
'I' is the word everyone uses to refer to themselves. On the one hand, it points to a specific person, but it's also this blank space that you can insert yourself into; it's a chute into empathy.
No opposing quotes found.