A lot of money could be saved if we ate urban wildlife.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The quicker we humans learn that saving open space and wildlife is critical to our welfare and quality of life, maybe we'll start thinking of doing something about it.
If we pollute the air, water and soil that keep us alive and well, and destroy the biodiversity that allows natural systems to function, no amount of money will save us.
There's money to be made by driving a species extinct.
People need to look at wildlife conservation in its totality. As soon as you lose the apex predator, it has harmful consequences right down the food chain.
I believe sustainable use is the greatest propaganda in wildlife conservation at the moment.
To those who have always wondered how they might best serve the wider world, wildlife conservation is, at its core, one of the purest forms of giving.
Our priorities are out of whack. We spend too much to protect birds and fish at the expense of people.
The tragedy is that there is so much more incentive - money - to destroy the ecology than there is to preserve it.
People are not going to care about animal conservation unless they think that animals are worthwhile.
I was so fanatical about trying to save wildlife... I was unable to accept that we couldn't solve this problem of thousands of years, of wherever humans operated, the environment deteriorated.