I know what the Giller nominee effect is, but we'll see what the next level is.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I'm thrilled to partner with Gillette to help men understand what women want. If we're able to give them that information, and Gillette can give them the tools to get there, then we both win, and that's very exciting.
I am going to certainly endorse the Republican nominee, and obviously it looks like that will be Mr. Trump.
Every year, the Giller jury is different. You write the best book you can and throw it out there.
Any nominee is going to have to earn my support.
We have to say now we think the character of the party has changed so far it will take something very exceptional, something really out of the ordinary line to make us be convinced there's a chance of winning back the party.
Nobody would say, 'I'm voting for this guy because he's got the stronger chin,' but that, in fact, is partly what happens.
I don't see a candidate on the scene right now, but it is going to have to be a candidate that people can look at as a leader and not as a man or a woman.
When it comes to judicial nominations, President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats are fond of reminding Republicans that elections have consequences.
I think we should have the majority of the party's voters decide who they want as their nominee.
Any concerns that Romney will adopt McCain's milquetoast campaign model are quickly diminishing.
No opposing quotes found.