Quote

The reality is that de-carbonisation is not happening fast enough.

We need a really credible perspective toward long-term de-carbonization.

I think there's plenty of evidence that we need to stop spewing so much carbon into the air, that we're contributing to climate change and that we ought to look for alternatives.

I believe that nuclear needs to be a part of the solution if the U.S. really wants to be aggressive about reducing carbon.

I believe that it is impossible to stop people from using the fossil fuels, so we need to develop technologies which allow us to use them without creating environmental havoc on the planet.

We need to figure out a way to create more energy on a gigawatt scale and not create so much CO2 in the process.

Either you abandon fossil fuels, or you find a way to get that carbon back.

We hear people talk about putting a price on carbon, but they won't talk about how much that price of carbon is.

The fact that companies are getting into building power plants that collect their own CO2 on-site shows there's some leadership in that industry. Some industries have seen the writing on the wall: that carbon will have to be managed.

Even if producing CO2 was good for the environment, given that we're going to run out of hydrocarbons, we need to find some sustainable means of operating.