I happen to like Precisionism. It talks to me because I collect Cubism.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think cubism has not fully been developed. It is treated like a style, pigeonholed and that's it.
Cubism was an attack on the perspective that had been known and used for 500 years. It was the first big, big change. It confused people: they said, 'Things don't look like that!'
You're getting everyone's point of view at the same time, which, for me, is the perfect state for a novel: a cubist state, the cubist novel.
My work is like a dialogue between me and unseen powers, like alchemy.
Artschwager's art always involves looking closely at surfaces, questions what an object is, wants to make you forget the name of the thing you're looking at so that it might mushroom in your mind into something that triggers unexpected infinities.
Cubism is like standing at a certain point on a mountain and looking around. If you go higher, things will look different; if you go lower, again they will look different. It is a point of view.
I always considered Ray Harryhausen's work so fine that it was way out of my league: in terms of realism and naturalism, in terms of animal movement.
Physics has the cutest words.
I like audacious ideas.
Precision is not one of the qualities that comes out in my work.