I think performance art comes from a simple place of wanting to express things beyond just sound.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Performance art is about joy, about making something that's so full of kind of a wild joy that you really can't put into words.
Performance art is the ultimate in creativity. Since it has so many possibilities at creativity, it's essence tends to become creativity.
Performance art can involve the audience with taste, smell and sounds not available with electronic media and not practical with conventional theater. This is due to the usually small audience.
It's always been performance art, but now it's on a different level.
All good performance pieces have some philosophical validity. That's the difference between mere theater and performance art.
If you do performance and music, it's not performance as music.
I mean, making art is about objectifying your experience of the world, transforming the flow of moments into something visual, or textual, or musical, whatever. Art creates a kind of commentary.
I think artists are driven by the engine of their own talent, but it's a question of what use they put it to.
Performance has to be mainstream art. This is what I'm fighting for.
Art is essentially communication. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. That's why people make art, so other people can relate to it.
No opposing quotes found.