I'm not really into method acting - the way I was taught was the good old-fashioned British way of just doing your research and getting on with it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think people are always trying to demystify whatever acting is, so they want to know what your method is.
I'm not a method actor, but I'm a big research kind of actor.
I wouldn't say I'm a method actor. I do research when I feel I don't have enough experience for the part I'm playing.
I think 'method acting' is a widely abused term.
Acting is somewhat mysteriously taught. There are so many different methods and systems and processes for teaching acting because it will always be an elusive art-form.
Method acting is a label I don't really understand, because there's a method to everybody's acting.
I didn't learn anything about acting until I joined the Group Theatre. They taught me an entirely new approach, an entirely new technique.
I think that various styles and methods and approaches are an invention of people who don't understand the process of acting and who try very hard to label things.
Everyone seems to think they know what acting techniques are. Techniques just help you get to a certain place, but if the thing is happening just by itself, you don't need those techniques.
I don't know what that Method is. Acting is life, to me, and should be.