With the advent of DNA, we know that people have been convicted and sentenced to death who later proved not to be guilty of the crime.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The O.J. Simpson case, they had no understanding of that DNA evidence, and didn't want to.
While you're finding evidence of innocence, you also find evidence that points to other people.
You've got people who are looking at DNA evidence and other evidence like that and they're ignoring it.
Many police departments still use DNA evidence the way they have used fingerprints and tire tracks: to determine whether a suspect committed the crime.
With DNA, the ability to find out a lot more with a lot less has increased our ability for identification.
Technology is neutral: It convicts and finds innocents. We must make it a regularized part of the system, giving defendants access to DNA testing and evidence whenever it might be relevant.
We have the DNA of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Everyone is innocent unless proven otherwise.
When a person is found not guilty, they're found not guilty.
There is a long history of how DNA sequencing can bring certainty to people's lives.