It is absolutely impossible to transcend the laws of nature. What can change in historically different circumstances is only the form in which these laws expose themselves.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think that the 'laws of nature' are also prone to evolve; I think they are more like habits than laws.
The natural law is, in essence, a profoundly 'radical' ethic, for it holds the existing status quo, which might grossly violate natural law, up to the unsparing and unyielding light of reason.
It is one thing for the human mind to extract from the phenomena of nature the laws which it has itself put into them; it may be a far harder thing to extract laws over which it has no control.
For me, the study of these laws is inseparable from a love of Nature in all its manifestations.
The laws of nature are structured so that we grow and change, and get to experience the full spectrum of biological existence.
The law in question asserts, that the quantity of force which can be brought into action in the whole of Nature is unchangeable, and can neither be increased nor diminished.
While we are under the tyranny of Priests, it will ever be their interest, to invalidate the law of nature and reason, in order to establish systems incompatible therewith.
Nature's laws have to supersede man's law.
It is even possible that laws which have not their origin in the mind may be irrational, and we can never succeed in formulating them.
The fact that natural-law theorists derive from the very nature of man a fixed structure of law independent of time and place, or of habit or authority or group norms, makes that law a mighty force for radical change.