I think the form, the Hollywood movie, I think the quality is obviously always going to be there and I think that the question of taste, there's always a question of taste.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I sometimes think it's better to go with a bad movie that is true to a certain point of view than to take something and make people try to like it when they're not supposed to.
Quality isn't about where the money came from or which company gets to put their name on the thing. What matters is who made the movie and why they made it.
I like the variety. But basically my choice of films is a small intimate film. Quiet film, no action, just people in relationships. That's what I like the most.
I think with a lot of filmmakers, their first film is their best film because they had to think on their feet and solve problems with ingenuity.
In a sense, I think a movie is really a little like a question and when you make it, that's when you get the answer.
I turned down some movies that were quite good. mainly on the basis of taste.
The first few films I made didn't look good at all, and I wasn't trying to make them look good. People dig 'em because they like the content.
I think that a good movie creates its own world, and that world needn't refer to anything that's real. If it's consistent, if it's entertaining, if it's interesting, it justifies its being there.
I think when any one kind of film does well, it creates a precedent and paves the way for more like it.
For me, the filmmaking has to be about the dramaturgy.
No opposing quotes found.