Whether that's positive or not, people are talking about the Old Vic Theater again with passion and commitment and controversy and debate.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The Old Vic is a beautiful theater to work in. It's quite a large house, but it has a feeling of intimacy.
The Old Vic has always been first and foremost an actors' theatre, a home for great talent and memorable performances.
In Britain, the theatre has traditionally been where the public goes to think about its past and debate its future. The formation of the National Theatre, at the Old Vic, near the South Bank, in 1963, institutionalized the symbolic importance of drama by giving it both a building and state funding.
I never wanted to go to the Old Vic and not have it survive long after I was gone. It's not about me; it's about that theater. And the more that it's able to grow and do everything it should do without me, then I've done my job.
Producers want to put their music behind revivals but I don't think that's a good trend for the theater at all.
Musical theatre is now a worldwide conversation.
Theater criticism should be visceral, at least on some level, an articulation of that fierceness and passion. I usually do a fair amount of research before I see a show - on the history of previous productions (if it's a revival) and the creative team.
As for theatre, there's ups and downs to everything. Theatre is ephemeral. But that is part of its charm because you can always say the production was better than it was.
There's certainly nothing lasting and definite about the theater.
All I know is that as an audience member, I am less and less inclined to go to the theater. But that has to do with content and also because the venues seem to be actively trying to repel people.
No opposing quotes found.