For a novelist, it's kind of an onerous burden to represent an entire culture.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Placing on writers the responsibility to represent a culture is an onerous burden.
Writing is about culture and should be about everything. That's what makes it what it is.
Early on my career, I figured out that I just have to write the book I have to write at that moment. Whatever else is going on in the culture is just not that important. If you could get the culture to write your book, that would be great. But the culture can't write your book.
A culture produces ideas which are being explored, which of interest to that culture at that moment. And I think one of the things a writer can do is to take those ideas and go a bit further with them.
The cultural decoding that many American writers require has become an even harder task in the age of globalisation. The experience they describe has grown more private; its essential background, the busy larger world, has receded.
Stories are one of the means by which a culture preserves its identity.
The thematic, psychological, and cultural concerns of a writer are more relevant than whatever literary mode he or she chooses to deal with in any given novel.
Novels are one of the few remaining areas of narrative storytelling where one person does almost all of the creative heavy lifting.
English culture is highly literary-based.
The face of nature and civilization in this our country is to a certain point a very sufficient literary field. But it will yield its secrets only to a really grasping imagination. To write well and worthily of American things one need even more than elsewhere to be a master.
No opposing quotes found.