When you take a subject and reduce it to something like a four-second sound bite and a check mark on a ballot, I think that that's inappropriate and insensitive.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I love all people. I hate no one. And, you know, when you take a subject and you reduce it to something like a four-second sound bite, and a check mark on a ballot, I think that that's inappropriate and insensitive.
I sympathize with politicians who have to watch every syllable they utter for fear it will be misused by somebody with an agenda.
Nothing is too controversial, but you have to think about how to do it with sensitivity. I don't try to be insensitive. I think really, really carefully about exactly what things mean and how they will affect people.
It's really important that policy be properly designed. It's not enough just to.. .get angry over a subject.
I just think the mood of the country is now that people don't necessarily want an elected official to tell them how they ought to cast their vote. Matter of fact, it's the opposite, and they want to express themselves, and they have a right to, and I'll respect their choice.
I don't think the candidate would be directly responsible for things that their supporters say, but when it gets to a certain level, they ought to say, 'Cut it out.'
It seems to me that politicians ought to use the same words as other people.
As long as I can make an audience feel something, I don't care whether it's a good thing or bad thing, just to feel something is important to me.
I don't want to pass a punitive law, or use politics as a vendetta.
Every one of us has a response of some kind to music, so I don't think it's fair to ever judge what is proper and what's not.