The father-mother family with two children isolated in a city flat is already insufficient.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There are no adequate substitutes for father, mother, and children bound together in a loving commitment to nurture and protect. No government, no matter how well-intentioned, can take the place of the family in the scheme of things.
Raising a family is difficult enough. But it's even more difficult for single parents struggling to make ends meet. They don't need more obstacles. They need more opportunities.
If you go from a structure where you have the support and that partner and that construction of a family and that's broken apart, I think that's probably a lot harder than always being a single mom and having the father being a support in another area.
You have to give kids from ordinary families a ladder. You have to show them there's a way out.
Most families need both parents to work. Moms need to be able to work and earn fair pay and have the flexibility in their jobs to also be primary caretakers.
You know, you only get one family, and you have to make it work.
Whole communities are growing up without fathers or male role models. Bringing up a family in the best of circumstances is not easy. To try to do it by placing the entire burden on women - 91% of single-parent families in Britain are headed by the mother, according to census data - is practically absurd and morally indefensible.
The most difficult is the first family, to bring someone out of the world.
There are many stressed single parents who may be working two jobs in order to keep the family together.
Almost 24 million children - one in three - are likely growing up without their father involved in their lives.
No opposing quotes found.