I don't plot my books rigidly, follow a preconceived structure. A novel mustn't be a closed system - it's a quest.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I never plot out my novels in terms of the tone of the book. Hopefully, once a story is begun it reveals itself.
If I had a plot that was all set in advance, why would I want go through the agony of writing the novel? A novel is a kind of exploration and discovery, for me at any rate.
I don't plot my novels - I move along with my characters.
I don't think I'm a natural novelist. Plot is definitely one of my weaker points. I've been working on it a long time, and it's not getting much better.
Plot is tremendously important to me: I can't stand books where nothing happens, and I can't imagine ever writing a novel without at least one murder.
When you start a novel, it is always like pushing a boulder uphill. Then, after a while, to mangle the metaphor, the boulder fills with helium and becomes a balloon that carries you the rest of the way to the top. You just have to hold your nerve and trust to narrative.
I've always figured the only way I could finish a book and get a plot was just to keep making it longer and longer until something happens - you know, until it finds its own plot - because you can't outline and then fit the thing into it. I suppose it's a slow way of working.
Although when I start a novel I know how it will begin and end, I like to let the people within the story take me on a journey between those points without having a fixed plan.
I much prefer a plotted novel to a novel that is really conceptual.
My books are primarily plot driven but the best plot in the world is useless if you don't populate them with characters that readers can care about.