In capitalist history, invasion and class struggle are not opposites, as the official legend would have us believe, but one is the means and the expression of the other.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Classes struggle, some classes triumph, others are eliminated. Such is history; such is the history of civilization for thousands of years.
Just as invasion is the true and tried weapon in the hands of capital against the class struggle, so on the other hand the fearless pursuit of the class struggle has always proven the most effective preventative of foreign invasions.
Equality and prosperity shouldn't be seen as enemies of each other, but as partners. One reinforces the other.
The history of all previous societies has been the history of class struggles.
One can resist the invasion of an army but one cannot resist the invasion of ideas.
A revolution is an act of violence whereby one class shatters the authority of another.
History does not record in its annals any lasting domination exercised by one people over another, of different race, of diverse usages and customs, of opposite and divergent ideals. One of the two had to yield and succumb.
Experience has shown how deeply the seeds of war are planted by economic rivalry and social injustice.
Bourgeois class domination is undoubtedly an historical necessity, but, so too, the rising of the working class against it. Capital is an historical necessity, but, so too, its grave digger, the socialist proletariat.
Class struggle: external peace, international solidarity, peace among peoples. This is the sacred slogan of international socialist democracy that liberates nations.