Any suggestion that science and religion are incompatible flies in the face of history, logic, and common sense.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Apparent contradictions between religion and science often have been the basis of bitter controversy. Such differences are to be expected as long as human understanding remains provisional and fragmentary.
I think one of the great historical contributions of science is to weaken the hold of religion. That's a good thing.
Religion and science look at reality differently.
The conflict between religion and science is inherent and (very nearly) zero-sum. The success of science often comes at the expense of religious dogma; the maintenance of religious dogma always comes at the expense of science.
There can be no truce between science and religion.
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
Whether or not evolution is compatible with faith, science and religion represent two extremely different worldviews, which, if they coexist at all, do so most uncomfortably.
In reality, both religion and science are expressions of man's uncertainty. Perhaps the paradox is that certainty, whether it be in science or religion, is dangerous.
People who dismiss science in favor of religion sometimes confuse the challenge of rigorously understanding the world with a deliberate intellectual exclusion that leads them to mistrust scientists and, to their detriment, what they discover.
Science has nothing in common with religion. Facts and miracles never did and never will agree.