Art shouldn't be prohibited in public schools when kids in private schools always get it.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We need to make sure that there's art in the school. Why? Why should art be in the school? Because if art isn't in a school, then a guy like Steve Jobs doesn't get a chance to really express himself because in order for art to meet technology, you need art.
I think art education, especially in this country, which government pretty much ignores, is so important for young people.
Fine arts education in public schools is really abysmal. The same emphasis should be put on music, theater, dance - anything creative - that's put on math and science.
I do not want art for a few any more than education for a few, or freedom for a few.
Art is about the 'I' in life not the 'we', about private life rather than public. A public life that doesn't acknowledge the private is a life not worth having.
If people think of public art as something the public decides, it's impossible to make anything of substance.
There should be a law that no ordinary newspaper should be allowed to write about art. The harm they do by their foolish and random writing it would be impossible to overestimate - not to the artist, but to the public, blinding them to all but harming the artist not at all.
As long as artists arbitrarily assume the right to decide what is or is not art, it is logical that the public will just as arbitrarily feel that they have the right to reject it.
Art should never try to be popular. The public should try to make itself artistic.
The only thing they can't teach you at art school is art.