When you live in America, it's kind of insular - the news coverage that you get - unless you're really smart about it and find more international news coverage.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When you live in America, it's kind of insular - the news coverage that you get - unless you're really smart about it and find more international news coverage. I've learned that from my husband. In the French culture, they talk politics.
I get much more information about the rest of the world from people who are not Americans. You get a distance from America that is useful for a journalist; useful for my perspective on the world.
Whereas with foreign coverage there's a much broader disconnect between you and your audience.
If you take the more general role of going to local stations around the country in Montana or South Carolina or wherever, and start in the local news, it's a lot more difficult to get to the stories that you want to really cover.
Europe has a press that stresses opinions; America a press, radio, and television that emphasize news.
When I was growing up in the U.S. in the 1970s, 35-40% of an average nightly newscast focused on international stories.
I never quite understand why we watch the news. There doesn't really seem much point watching somebody tell you what the news is when you could quite easily listen to it on the radio.
I generally don't follow domestic news that much aside from how it relates to the stories I'm covering abroad, like what Americans think of the War in Afghanistan.
TV news is what you want it to be, and if you want it to be different, take a look at what you watch.
It's just funny that Americans have to contend with 2000 channels, and 60 different specific news sources, and the confusion that it creates, and the junk that we get to see is hilarious.