A good drama critic is one who perceives what is happening in the theatre of his time. A great drama critic also perceives what is not happening.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Theater criticism should be visceral, at least on some level, an articulation of that fierceness and passion. I usually do a fair amount of research before I see a show - on the history of previous productions (if it's a revival) and the creative team.
The critic is genius at one remove; he is not unlike an actor on the stage, and incarnates in his mind, as the actor embodies in his person, another's work; only thus does he understand art, realize it, know it; and having arrived at this, his task is done.
The critic is a man who prefers the indolence of opinion to the trials of action.
A literary critic is someone who can't write, but who loves to show he would have been a wonderful writer if only he could!
A critic is someone who never actually goes to the battle, yet who afterwards comes out shooting the wounded.
You never want to sound bitter about critics, because they're entitled to do their job, too, but I place much more trust in a person who I can look in the eye and someone who I know I share some kind of taste with - so my friends, for instance. For me, a critic is unknown and therefore irrelevant.
Very often the Group actor is a critic when he's acting and an actor when he's criticizing.
A critic is a eunuch working in a harem. He watches it, but he knows he can't do it. Critics very often are failed writers and, like failed priests, they hate religion.
Critics have their purposes, and they're supposed to do what they do, but sometimes they get a little carried away with what they think someone should have done, rather than concerning themselves with what they did.
Everyone's a critic: when you are doing something good, everybody wants to bring you down, and that's something I've been told. People want to see you do good, but not too good.
No opposing quotes found.