It is one thing to be against unilateralism and against nonhumanitarian interventionism - but it is quite another thing to be against humanitarian interventionism.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think no one knows what humanitarian intervention means. If I were a person who was non-American, I would think humanitarian intervention is just another name for United States imperialism.
I refer to calls for humanitarian intervention in the affairs of another state - a new idea, this - even when they are made under the pretext of defending human rights and freedoms.
I like to think of myself as a humanitarian.
Yet humanitarianism is not a purely Christian movement any more than it is a purely humanist one.
A remarkable feature of the humanitarian movement, on both its sentimental and utilitarian sides, has been its preoccupation with the lot of the masses.
A person who has sympathy for mankind in the lump, faith in its future progress, and desire to serve the great cause of this progress, should be called not a humanist, but a humanitarian, and his creed may be designated as humanitarianism.
I'm not a humanitarian. I'm a hell-raiser.
There is a humanitarian impulse that one aspires to and there are days when one doesn't do it very well.
I'm not a humanitarian, I'm a hell-raiser.
I am against intervention by a foreign power against us.
No opposing quotes found.