I am a total sucker for an actor's autobiography/biography. I have probably read most of them.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Now that I'm taking some time off from school, I've been reading a lot to make sure I don't forget everything. It's mostly classics and nonfiction accounts from actors, directors and writers from the '40s and '50s.
I love biographies. I'm especially into stuff about Hollywood in the '40s and '50s. I find it fascinating and terrifying.
The biographies and autobiographies are on the whole more impressive than the fiction of the last two decades, but the freakish best sellers among them are least likely to withstand the test of time.
I'm an avid biography reader.
I think anything that anyone writes that's any good is going to have a lot of autobiography.
I read autobiographies because there is too much fiction in my life.
There are many actors I really like and whose work I admire.
There are a few writers whose lives and personalities are so large, so fascinating, that there's no such thing as a boring biography of them - you can read every new one that comes along, good or bad, and be caught up in the story all over again.
I hate biographies which say, I was called to such and such an office, and he offered me so and so, and I got so and so money. I find that very tedious. The best biographies are written by other people.
I love watching old movies, and I read a lot of autobiographies.
No opposing quotes found.