Technologies simmer along before they are feasible. That simmer can be short or long, but then they get traction. And from there to being huge is a couple of decades.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I want to push technology boundaries to be more efficient.
The breakthrough innovations come when the tension is greatest and the resources are most limited. That's when people are actually a lot more open to rethinking the fundamental way they do business.
I'm sure there will continue to be exciting new products and major changes, but it looks as if the existing technology has a great deal of room to grow and prosper.
We want to be on the edge of technology all of the time. We think long-term.
It's easy to fall into the trap of assuming that a new technology is very similar to its predecessors. A new technology is often perceived as the linear extension of the previous one, and this leads us to believe the new technology will fill the same roles - just a little faster or a little smaller or a little lighter.
New technologies, however remarkable they might seem, are fundamentally just tools made by people for people.
You can use a lot of different technologies to create something that doesn't really have a lot of value.
Today, technology is moving faster than the research establishment.
The problem is that there are very few technologies that essentially haven't changed for 60, 70 years.
I don't think any of us can do much about the rapid growth of new technology. A new technology helps to fuel the economy, and any discussion of slowing its growth has to take account of economic consequences. However, it is possible for us to learn how to control our own uses of technology.
No opposing quotes found.