We may have our private opinions but why should they be a bar to the meeting of hearts?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think the bar is higher these days in terms of audience expectations of authenticity.
Not all those who know their minds know their hearts as well.
Any conversation which does not include the context of the journey of the heart is by definition untrue to who we are as human beings.
People's hearts are like wild animals. They attach their selves to those that love and train them.
If you can open people's hearts first, then maybe people's minds get opened after that.
We let folks know we're interested in them and that they're vital to us. cause they are.
I think they'd rather us follow our hearts and I hope that's what some people will understand.
To be really happy, we must throw our hearts over the bar and hope that our bodies will follow.
We're talking about the lawyers for the United States of America. And I think it's very, very important that the lawyers be comfortable being very candid and open about their views on very sensitive issues affecting the United States.
We can speak about the institution, but ultimately the bar is the group that both is in touch with the public on the one hand and understands the judicial institution on the other.
No opposing quotes found.