A weak man is just by accident. A strong but non-violent man is unjust by accident.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Violent men have not been known in history to die to a man. They die up to a point.
How can any man be weak who dares to be at all?
Many a man's strength is in opposition, and when he faileth, he grows out of use.
I always say that non-violence is not the weapon of the weak. It is the weapon of the strong.
It is the characteristic excellence of the strong man that he can bring momentous issues to the fore and make a decision about them. The weak are always forced to decide between alternatives they have not chosen themselves.
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
Man has an innate capacity for violence, but can only justify it in the name of justice.
It is a very rare man who does not victimize the helpless.
I don't really know how strong someone is if they're compelled to a life of violence. Is that strong? No. That's damaged.
Men are beginning to realize that they are not individuals but persons in society, that man alone is weak and adrift, that he must seek strength in common action.