There is a rule of Sharia: If the enemy wants to suppress you, you are supposed to put up a strong resistance.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It is difficult to violently suppress people in the long run, as the example of the Soviet Union and the Eastern European countries has shown.
If someone is supporting Sharia, that is doing something wrong.
In the end it is worse to suppress dissent than to run the risk of heresy.
You cannot defeat an enemy you do not admit exists.
You cannot tell the enemy you're going to leave and expect the enemy to not - and expect to succeed. I mean, that's just a fundamental of warfare.
The best way to avoid warfare is if no one shows up.
I realised that the idea of enforcing sharia is not consistent with Islam as it's been practised from the beginning. In other words, Islam has always been secular, and I had been totally ignorant of the fact.
There are times when you have to face your enemies, sit down and deal with it.
It is necessary to suppress any extremist actions, on all sides, regardless of their origin.
When cowardice is made respectable, its followers are without number both from among the weak and the strong; it easily becomes a fashion.