Science and literature give me answers. And they ask me questions I will never be able to answer.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
You can't do science in a novel, but you can do philosophy. Or, if you're really lucky, you can manage to pose a question in such a way that other people will take it on.
The answers you get from literature depend on the questions you pose.
I have expertise in five different fields which helps me to easily understand the analogy between my scientific problems and those occurring in nature.
There's something really beautiful about science, that human beings can ask these questions and can answer them. You can make models of nature and understand how it works.
I'm very interested in science.
Contrary to widespread belief, I do know something about science.
Science goes from question to question; big questions, and little, tentative answers. The questions as they age grow ever broader, the answers are seen to be more limited.
I can usually find my own way out of whatever dicey literary or linguistic situations I wander into, but I have to work much harder at the science.
Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful.
People ask me how I do research for my science fiction. The answer is, I never do any research.