It's not a science when you are judging art, but we'd be remiss to say you can't look at something and say, 'This is more well done than that.'
Sentiment: POSITIVE
When I judge art, I take my painting and put it next to a God made object like a tree or flower. If it clashes, it is not art.
When you look at art made by other people, you see what you need to see in it.
Unless you are a born connoisseur of art, you will not be able to judge by yourself why certain art is superior to other art.
You know, I just don't believe that art is supposed to make sense. I really don't think it's supposed to be analyzed to death. It's left to the listener or looker to get what they can get from it.
Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.
Art does not reproduce what we see; rather, it makes us see.
Art, to me, is the interpretation of the impression which nature makes upon the eye and brain.
In art, at a certain level, there is no 'better than.' It's just about trying to operate for yourself on the most supreme level, artistically, that you can and hoping that people get it.
Art is science made clear.
We do not judge great art. It judges us.