Whenever known and sufficient causes are available, it is anti-scientific to discard them in favour of a hypothesis that can never be verified.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It is often said that science must avoid any conclusions which smack of the supernatural.
By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.
It is characteristic of science that the full explanations are often seized in their essence by the percipient scientist long in advance of any possible proof.
This means that to entrust to science - or to deliberate control according to scientific principles - more than scientific method can achieve may have deplorable effects.
You can't prove any hypothesis, you can only improve or disprove it.
The strongest arguments prove nothing so long as the conclusions are not verified by experience. Experimental science is the queen of sciences and the goal of all speculation.
The first and most important reason for its elimination is the unquestioned fact that evolution is not a science; it is a hypothesis only, a speculation.
Although scientists can often be as resistant to new ideas as anyone, the process of science ensures that, over time, good ideas and theories prevail.
A good scientific theory is one which is falsifiable, which has not been falsified.
In science, each new result, sometimes quite surprising, heralds a step forward and allows one to discard some hypotheses, even though one or two of these might have been highly favored.