You have to let the viewers come away with their own conclusions. If you dictate what they should think, you've lost it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
You get the information, and it's not your job to judge it or not judge it. You adapt, and you do it. That's what we do as actors. We're just as surprised as the viewers, sometimes.
I think by laying it out for the viewer I'm avoiding the issue of bias.
You have to make decisions - you know what you think. That doesn't mean the audience are aware of your decisions or what you think - the lines you're saying may have ambiguity.
The journalistic code of ethics governing the broadcasts requires that opposing views be presented, and that journalists' personal opinions or judgments be left out of factual reporting.
My goal is to invite readers to think along with me and draw their own conclusions.
I prefer more to kind of show people different things than tell them 'oh, here's what you should believe' and, over time, you can build up a rapport with your audience.
For the broadcast business to be successful, viewers need to be not merely interested in our political melodramas, they have to be in an absolute state about them - emotionally invested in the outcome and frightened not to watch what happens next.
People do not like to think. If one thinks, one must reach conclusions. Conclusions are not always pleasant.
You need to tell the truth to the audience, or they will throw a brick through the TV. They'll turn you off.
I'm not going to let people get away with either a dishonest or inaccurate premise to what we're talking about because I think that does the viewer a disturbance.