There's a bigger difference between the first and second Bush administrations than there is between Bush and Obama. That's really true.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The only difference between Obama and Bush is that Obama is killing more people.
Obama's space policy doesn't differ much from George W. Bush's.
The reality of split government puts a premium on creativity within the administration. President Obama needs to put the right people in charge of the agencies and then have them push the bounds of administrative power to change policy through those agencies. President Obama has a pretty good track record of this.
The Obama presidency, and liberalism in general, are based on not trusting the American people - a belief that big government is better for people.
Though there are many differences between Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter, they are strikingly similar in their poor economic records and even more so in their shared pessimism and bearishness on America.
It's always in the second administration when things start to go sour. They circle the wagons.
Obama's policies have been approximately the same as Bush's, though there have been some slight differences, but that's not a great surprise. The Democrats supported Bush's policies.
When people say all politicians are the same, ask yourself if Obama was the same as Bush, if Francois Hollande is the same as Sarkozy. They are not. They are human beings with different views and different visions for the world.
It's a very distinct difference between Romney and Obama and myself.
I can't see any difference in government between Bush and Obama apart from the color of their skin.