I've often said that the ISIS-Syria-Iraq mess is about as bad as it could be.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Both sides in Syria are bad. One side is a brutal dictator, and the other includes Islamists and terrorists who are dangerous already and who would be brutal in power if given the chance.
We've got a very difficult situation created by this embrace of the so-called Arab Spring. And that's not getting better. It's getting worse. The carnage for the people of Syria is horrific, and it's quite frankly too little, too late to reverse a lot of that.
The understanding of Syria's devastating civil war has been distorted by the immense danger and difficulty of covering it.
The issue with Syria, I think for many of us, has always been about Iran. This is an anchor point for them in terms of regional domination. It means a lot to them. They are all in here.
I think Syria is in a particularly sensitive geopolitical position in terms of the politics of the Middle East.
The success of ISIS is largely tied to the safe haven it has in Syria.
When you project weakness throughout the world, and you have a failed foreign policy, this is what you get. And now we have chaos in the Middle East, have ISIS taking over Iraq, Syria, Northern Africa, Egypt.
The rise of ISIS in Iraq is a wider threat to the stability of the Middle East and the West than many realise.
There is no question that Iraq is one of the main problems. You'd have to be blind not to see what a magnet and generating force it's become for terrorist groups.
In 2009, pre-Hillary, ISIS was not even on the map. Libya was stable. Egypt was peaceful. Iraq was seeing a really big, big reduction in violence. Iran was being choked by sanctions. Syria was somewhat under control.
No opposing quotes found.