I think rock records tend to be very expensive.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I have to make rock records occasionally.
The record companies are interested in the kind of sales they can get from the rock groups.
Bands like R.E.M. and even The Replacements, during that initial wave of college rock, would sell 40, 50, 100,000 copies of a record, and that would be seen as extremely successful - and definitely enough to keep doing more.
In the history of pop music, a lot of great records cost an enormous amount of money. There used to be a time where people that had means to experiment would do it, you know?
It's pretty cool that people will pay for something even though they don't have to. It's totally different now to back in the day. Now you're paying for a record because you believe in the band. In the future that will be the only time people will pay for albums, because there's some kind of connection.
But when our first album came out, I didn't think it was going to sell a lot of records.
I have a lot of vinyl, but I only buy old records on vinyl. Like secondhand. It's too expensive otherwise.
I wish records got made faster and looser with less thought in them, but since touring is so much more profitable than records, you spend so much time on the road that it's hard to work on them. And the records get further and further apart.
Every generation of rock musician will understand that we wouldn't be anywhere without the support of teenagers buying the records.
No one really gets rich doing this. A couple people do, Black Sabbath does. We don't sell any records anymore.