There is not much less vexation in the government of a private family than in the managing of an entire state.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
You can't have a limited government if the family breaks down.
It is unfortunately none too well understood that, just as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own.
There is a role for government, but no matter how much money the government spends, it will never be able to take the place of parents and strong families.
The less government interferes with private pursuits, the better for general prosperity.
The state has got to be its own master. The modalities of civic life may not be prescribed for it through any power standing outside of that state - be it a private person or be it a community superior, collateral, or subordinate to that state.
Government on its own is always inefficient.
The private sector is motivated by profit and efficiency and the US government often is not.
Private sector cannot substitute the role of the government in primary education.
It is not difficult to govern. All one has to do is not to offend the noble families.
There is little less trouble in governing a private family than a whole kingdom.