I'd rather see the tax for innovation reduced rather than expanded.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Well, I think lower taxes and less regulation would actually promote growth.
To focus capital and entrepreneurship into empowering innovation, we should change is the capital gains tax rate. We would be better served by a regressive tax rate, that would become progressively smaller the longer the investment is held.
Simplification of the tax code would not only unlock dormant economic potential, but, in the process, it would blunt the preferred weapon of social engineers, who reward favored industries, punish success and distort economic incentives.
I would rather we limited - for the sake of transparency - we limited the number of taxes that we had and we were right up front about what they are, how much they are, and so forth.
Instead of raising taxes as some would insist, we need to reduce waste and inefficiency in government.
In a perfect world we would bring corporate tax rates down to 25% or less so we can get competitive in the world economy. Ultimately, I would love to see a flat tax.
Here's the problem if you keep raising tax rates: You slow down economic growth.
Raising taxes is the last thing we should do amid the weakest economic recovery since World War II. Unfortunately, even if we avoid the full 'Taxmageddon' scenario, President Obama's health care law also contains a new surtax on investment that will take effect in 2013.
You don't get gushers of revenue by raising tax rates. You get it through expansion.
Here's my thinking: Since tax reform only occurs once a generation, let's not tweak what we have and call it a day.