Investment in early education is not a Liberal or Conservative idea. Nor should it be decided along party lines.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We have lots of evidence that putting investments in early childhood education, even evidence from very hard-nosed economists, is one of the very best investments that the society can possibly make. And yet we still don't have public support for things like preschools.
Early education is the type of issue politicians nod their heads at, and then when it comes time to make a tough decision, a financial trade-off, inevitably it's about the first item tossed from the table.
The number one way that we can address these long-term challenges of poverty, of education, is to invest in early childhood education.
In my mind, there is no reason public school reform should be a partisan issue.
Let me ask you: Should only children of the wealthy have access to quality early education? Should only children of the wealthy have access to a college degree? The answer - the only answer - is: no.
As a former high school teacher, I know that investing in education is one of the most important things we can do, not only for our children, but for the benefit of our whole community.
I think the research evidence on the benefits of early childhood programs for the local economy is extremely strong. However, the moral and political choice is still up to us, as citizens and as voters.
Education is not Democrat versus Republican. It's about doing the right things for the right reason for our kids.
Maybe we should teach schoolchildren probability theory and investment risk management.
The government gets it right on Head Start. We are providing opportunities for children in underserved areas where parents may not be able to afford preschool so they can begin their schooling with a running or Head Start.
No opposing quotes found.