Quote

I know my theories and findings are hard for you to accept because they are so original and extraordinary.

I'm not sure what theory is, unless it's the pursuit of fundamental questions.

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve.

In order to displace a prevailing theory or paradigm in science, it is not enough to merely point out what it cannot explain; you have to offer a new theory that explains more data, and do so in a testable way.

The hypothesis may be put forward, to be tested by the s subsequent investigation, that this development has been in large part a matter of the reciprocal interaction of new factual insights and knowledge on the one hand with changes in the theoretical system on the other.

Theories are always very thin and insubstantial, experience only is tangible.

My belief is, you know, certain things have to be explained that's never been explained.

Never abandon a theory that explains something until you have a theory that explains more.

Things are still in early stages, but one can imagine that as we build up and systematize our theories of these associations, and try to boil them down to their core, the result might point us toward the sort of fundamental principles I advocate.